'Class actions' Archive
Highlighted news:
Categories
Search:
LCD Makers Agree To Pay $539M In Price-Fix Settlement
Seven major manufacturers of thin-film liquid crystal display (“LCD”) panels used in laptop computers, monitors and televisions agreed to pay $538.6 million to settle antitrust claims brought by indirect purchasers. The indirect purchaser plaintiffs allege that the defendant companies fixed prices of LCD panels, artificially inflating prices for purchasers of televisions, notebook computers and monitors from 1999 to 2006. The law firm of Andrus Anderson LLP is among counsel of record for the indirect purchaser plaintiffs in the case, which is currently pending before the Honorable Susan Illston in the Northern District of California. “The settlement will not only go to compensate consumers who paid more than they would have for these product in a competitive marketplace, but will also go a long way to prevent future price-fixing schemes in the electronics industry,” commented Andrus Anderson partner, Jennie Lee Anderson. The attorneys general of several states, including California, Michigan, Florida and New York, are also part of the settlement agreements with the manufacturers. The indirect purchase plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of the settlement was filed on December 23, 2011 and is currently pending before the court. Andrus Anderson represents consumers and small businesses in a variety of antitrust and unfair competition matters. For more information or to report unfair or anticompetitive activity, contact us to speak to an attorney.
Plaintiff Seeks Certification of Nationwide Class of Borrowers
On December 9, 2011, Andrus Anderson partner, Jennie Lee Anderson, lead counsel for plaintiff in Ralston v. Mortgage Investors Group and Countrywide Home Loans Inc., Case No. 08-00536 JF, argued before the District Court for the Northern District of California in support of plaintiff’s motion for class certification. Plaintiff’s motion seeks certification of a nationwide class of borrowers who purchased certain Pay Option ARM loans, which Plaintiff alleges Countrywide sold through a network of correspondent lenders and similarly deceptive and fraudulent in nature. For more information about the lawsuit or if you believe you ahve been the victim of a fraudulent lending practice, please contact us to speak to an attorney.
Federal Judge Approves Class Action Settlement To Benefit Current and Prior Owners of Toyota RAV4s
On January 6, 2012, the Honorable Richard Seeborg, District Court Judge for the Northern District of California, granted final approval of a class action settlement which will benefit current and former owners of 2001-2003 Toyota RAV4 Vehicles with an automatic transmission. The lawsuit alleges that the 2001-2003 model Toyota RAV4 Vehicles were equipped with defective Engine Control Modules (“ECMs”), which cause drivers to experience “hard shifting” and ultimately results in the automatic transmission failing prematurely. “The settlement is an excellent result for consumers,” said Andrus Anderson partner, Jennie Lee Anderson, who the Court appointed co-lead counsel for plaintiffs and the class in the case. “It ensures that current and former Vehicle owners will either have their Vehicles repaired under 10-year or 150,000 mile extended warranty program or be fully reimbursed for the costs of prior repairs.” For further information about the settlement or to file a claim, class members should visit the Toyota RAV4 Class Action Settlement Website.Andrus Anderson LLP Partners Take Leadership Roles At The American Association for Justice
Lori E. Andrus and Jennie Lee Anderson attended the American Association for Justice Annual Convention in New York City, July 9-12, 2011. In furtherance of their efforts in and outside of the courtroom to advance the interests of their clients, including injured consumers, employees and small business owners across the United States, Ms. Andrus and Ms. Anderson were both elected to presigious leadership positions this year. Ms. Andrus was elected First Vice Chair of the Women’s Trial Lawyer Caucus. Ms. Anderson is the incoming Co-Chair of the organization’s Class Action Litigation Group.
Andrus Anderson Files Nationwide Gender Discrimination Class Action Against Deere & Co.
On March 16, 2011, Andrus Anderson LLP filed a nationwide sex discrimination class action against Deere & Co. and John Deere Landscapes, Inc. (“Deere”). Artis v. Deere & Co. (Civ.10-05289 WHA). The suit charges that Deere, a leading farm, agricultural equiptment and landscaping company, systematically denies certain jobs to women and discourages them from even applying.
The Plaintiff, Holly Artis, applied for a customer service position at Deere’ s landscaping facility. Despite having over five years of sales and service experience, she was told that Deere “frowned upon hiring women” and was denied the job. She was falsely told that the position had been cancelled, when in fact it had been given to a man with less experience. “Deere should not be allowed to continue to deny qualified women employment or discourage them from applying because of their gender,” says co-lead counsel for Plaintiff and the proposed class, Andrus Anderson partner, Jennie Lee Anderson. “Female applicants must be given the opportunity to compete on a level playing field–that’s the law and it’s also the right thing to do.” The complete Press Release is available here. For further information, please Contact Us today, or visit Deere Class website.
Jennie Lee Anderson Argues In Class Action Against Countrywide; Legal Newspaper Takes Notice
On March 11, 2011, AA LLP’s Jennie Lee Anderson, lead counsel for Plaintiff in Ralston v. Mortgage Investors Group and Countrywide Home Loans Inc., Case No. 08-00536 JF, argued before the District Court for the Northern District of California in opposition to defendant Countrywide’s motion to strike class allegations. At the heart of the case are certain Pay Option ARM loans, which Plaintiff alleges Countrywide sold through a network of correspondent lenders, including, but not limited to, Mortgage Investors Group, that are similarly deceptive and fraudulent in nature. In its motion to strike, Countrywide seeks to drastically limit the number of class members Plaintiff may represent by limiting his claims to class members whose loans were obtained through Mortgage Investors Group. In advance of the argument, The Daily Journal interviewed Ms. Anderson about the case and the pending motion. Ms. Anderson was confident Plaintiff would prevail: “Countrywide’s motion is ‘a desperate attempt’ to deny discovery the plaintiffs believe will ‘show that all of these loans commonly flow from Countrywide,’” Ms. Anderson told the daily legal newspaper. According to Ms. Anderson, the motion should be heard, if at all, on the class certification schedule set by the Court and after the Plaintiffs have an opportunity to conduct discovery. The motion was taken under submission by Judge Fogel who indicated the Court would issue a written order.
Andrus Anderson Achieves Nationwide Class Action Settlement In Connection With Honda and Michelin PAX System Litigation
Andrus Anderson LLP announces that on June 23, 2009, the Honorable Roger W. Titus entered an Order granting final approval of a nationwide settlement in a consumer class action, which was filed on behalf of Plaintiffs from various States against Defendants, American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (“Honda”) and Michelin North America, Inc. (“Michelin”). The litigation involves the marketing and sale of certain Honda and Acura Vehicles equipped with Run-Flat Tires (“Vehicles”). The Settlement was negotiated over a number of months with the assistance of a nationally recognized mediator on behalf of Plaintiffs in all of the pending cases and on behalf of a proposed nationwide class with Honda and Michelin.
For settlement purposes, the Court certified a nationwide class consisting of all person or entities who currently own or lease, or previously owned or leased, a Honda Odyssey Touring edition model or Acura RL model equipped with the “Technology Package,” which included Michelin’s PAX® Tire and Wheel Assembly in the United States. Excluded from the class are Defendants, Defendants’ employees, officers and directors, and the Judge to whom this Action is or has been assigned. For a copy of the Court’s Order Preliminarily Approving the Settlement and the Settlement Agreement, please click on the appropriate links below. A detailed explanation of the relief under the Settlement can be found in the Class Notice. To view a copy of the Class Notice, please click here. To submit a claim in connection with this settlement, click here to down load a copy of the claim form which should be submitted by mail as directed.
Cal State ESL Teachers Represented by Andrus Anderson LLP
Andrus Anderson represents California State University-East Bay (Cal State) English as a second language (ESL) teachers in a class action in Alameda County Superior Court. The lawsuit, Nelson et al., v. California State University, East Bay Foundation, Inc., was filed on March 23, 2009 (Case No. RG09442869).
ESL Teachers Allege Violations of Labor Laws, Back Pay Owed
In their complaint, current and former ESL teachers allege that Cal State has not paid them for all hours worked, as required under California’s labor laws. Specifically, the teachers claim that Cal State’s refusal to pay for all time worked outside of the classroom (including preparation time, grading time and time spent meeting with students), violates California Wage Order 4-2001 and California’s Business & Professions Code § 17200. Additionally, the lawsuit alleges breach of contract, failure to pay waiting time penalties to former teachers, and failure to maintain accurate time keeping records.
The ESL teachers seek certification of a class of ESL teachers who have not been paid for all hours worked since March 23, 2005, and, among other things, seek back pay with interest, restitution, and civil penalties.
Contact Andrus Anderson
If you are an ESL teacher and have been denied pay for time spent outside of the classroom, we would like to learn more about your experience as part of our investigation. Please click here to submit your complaint.
Jennie Lee Anderson To Speak At Prominent Class Action Seminar
AA LLP partner Jennie Lee Anderson will join some of the most influential class action attorneys in the country when she presents at the Consumer Attorneys of California 3rd Annual Class Action Seminar on January 28, 2009 in San Francisco. Ms. Anderson will be speaking on Protective Orders and Discovery in Class Actions. “Because class actions implicate the rights of absent class members, it is important that stipulated protective orders only allow truly confidential documents to be filed under seal,” Ms. Anderson noted. “Too often the parties agree to broad protective orders that result in the case being litigated behind closed doors and away from public view,” she added. During her presentation, she will share her techniques for negotiating protective orders and other discovery tips.
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Consumers’ Rights In State Courts
Andrus Anderson LLP lauds a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Altria v. Good to deny immunity for cigarette manufacturers who violate state consumer protection laws with false claims of lowered tar and nicotine.
Partner Lori Andrus agrees with the statement issued by the America Association for Justice (www.justice.org): “Today’s decision is a victory for consumers and affirms that cigarette manufacturers cannot claim immunity from consumer fraud when they claim their products have lowered tar and nicotine levels, even though they do not. State laws have an important role to play in helping the federal government police false claims, and today’s decision supports that role.”
“We hope that the court continues to look at claims of corporate immunity from the perspective of consumer health and safety and continues to support the rights of consumers to get justice through the courts.”
To view the full Supreme Court opinion, click here.